Can Astrology Predict When We Will Die? A Thoughtful Discussion

The question of whether astrology can predict when we will die is one that has been debated for centuries. On one hand, many believe that the zodiac signs and planetary alignments at our birth can reveal insights into the course of our life, including its ending. On the other hand, modern science has found little evidence to support the predictive abilities of astrology.

In this post, I aim to have an open-minded and thoughtful discussion on this controversial subject. There are good-faith arguments on both sides, and nuance is required. Ultimately, this post will explore the reasoning behind astrological beliefs while also acknowledging the limitations of current scientific knowledge. My goal is to encourage further civil dialogue rather than promote any firm conclusions.

A Brief History of Astrology

To understand the question at hand, it is helpful to start with a quick history of astrology’s origins and development over time. Astrology dates back at least 3,000 years with roots in ancient Mesopotamia, Egypt, India, China, and Central America. It was often intertwined with astronomy and considered an honored science and art.

In modern times, astrology saw a popular revival starting in the 19th century alongside other metaphysical movements like Spiritualism and Theosophy. Today, astrology is often considered a pseudoscience or folk art by the scientific community, but it still has many devoted practitioners and followers in cultures worldwide.

Key Beliefs in Astrology

What are some of the core beliefs that astrologers draw on when making predictions about life and death? Here are a few key ideas:

  • The positions of celestial bodies like planets and stars at the time of a person’s birth profoundly influence their personality, future, and destiny.
  • The zodiac sign a person is born under shapes who they are. The twelve zodiac signs reflect different energies.
  • As the planets move through the zodiac over time, they create critical astrological events, transitions, and cycles that impact us.
  • Alignments between planets, called aspects, have specific effects–for example, Jupiter-Saturn alignments are seen as heralding new 20-year eras.
  • Precision is key. Astrologers use exact times and locations of birth to calculate an astrological chart or natal chart.

Given these core principles, astrologers look for certain astrological patterns to indicate events like illness or death. However, different astrological traditions vary greatly in techniques and interpretations.

Perspectives Against Astrological Predictions

Astrology has certainly existed for millennia and continues to influence many today. However, from a scientific perspective, there are good reasons to be cautious of astrological predictions about the timing of death.

Some key arguments against astrology’s abilities to predict mortality include:

  • Lack of a proven mechanism: Modern science has found no proven physical mechanism by which celestial bodies could influence human behavior and life events. Without a plausible mechanism, astrological predictions remain speculative.
  • Inconsistent results in research: Over the centuries, attempts to empirically and scientifically study astrology’s predictive abilities have yielded inconsistent and inconclusive results insufficient to establish credibility.
  • Possibility of self-fulfilling prophecies: Even seemingly precise predictions can become self-fulfilling prophecies if people consciously or subconsciously conform their expectations and actions to them. This makes objective verification difficult.
  • Vagueness and ambiguity: Astrological predictions are often vague and open to wide interpretation, allowing for selective bias in remembering “hits” versus “misses.”
  • Confirmation bias: Similarly, cognitive biases like confirmation bias mean believers may selectively focus on supporting evidence for astrological claims while ignoring contradictions.
  • Subjectivity of interpretations: Different astrologers often provide wildly divergent and even conflicting interpretations of the same chart, highlighting the subjectivity involved.

In summary, skepticism toward astrology’s predictive power is justified given the lack of verified empirical evidence and plausible mechanisms according to current scientific knowledge and consensus. However, science also has its limits.

Acknowledging Uncertainty and Unknowns

Given the discussion so far, it may seem reasonable to conclude that astrology cannot predict when we will die. However, fully dismissing this possibility would also be unwise given the enormous limitations and unknowns within current human knowledge. We must approach fantastic claims with critical thinking but also intellectual humility.

Some key reasons for uncertainty include:

  • Complexity of nature: Modern science has revealed our universe and biology to be far more complex and interconnected than we ever imagined. This leaves open doors for natural phenomena we scarcely comprehend.
  • Limits of science: Current scientific knowledge is but a small island in a vast ocean of mysteries about the workings of our cosmos and existence. Science is an ever-unfolding discovery process.
  • Subjective experience: Science seeks objective physical evidence but cannot directly measure or validate human consciousness, intention, and subjective experience–factors that could play a role.
  • Interconnectivity: From quantum entanglement to the butterfly effect, science has shown all things may be more interconnected than assumed. We cannot rule out subtle interconnections between celestial and human bodies.
  • The “unknown unknowns”: As some theories suggest, there may simply be fundamental aspects of reality entirely outside current human concepts and knowledge.

With so much uncertainty and so many “unknown unknowns,” we must resist the temptation for false certainty regarding astrology’s limits. Critical inquiry should continue.

Conclusion: A Balanced Perspective

In closing, I hope this post has provided a balanced and thoughtful perspective on the debate over astrology’s predictive abilities. Based on a reasoned evaluation of current evidence and arguments, skepticism toward astrological determinism seems justified. However, science still has endless horizons to explore.

Rather than definitive conclusions, I believe the wisest approach is to keep an open mind to new evidence while asking critical questions. We should seek to understand different views without judgment. Most importantly, we should recognize the inherent mystery of life’s biggest questions which no single paradigm can fully answer. With this spirit of humility and curiosity, the discussion can progress in a meaningful way.


Tarnas, Richard. Cosmos and Psyche: Intimations of a New World View. Penguin Group USA, 2007.

Dean, Geoffrey. Recent Advances in Natal Astrology: A Critical Review 1900-1976. Astrological Association, 1977.

Carlson, Shawn. “A Double-Blind Test of Astrology,“ Nature, vol. 318, 1985, pp. 419-425.

Blackmore, Susan and Seebold, Marcus. “Birthday Horoscopes,“ 2001, Accessed 15 Jan 2023.

Phillipson, Garry. Astrology in the Year Zero. Flare Publications, 2000.

Leave a comment