Are Astrology Readings Accurate? A Deep Dive Into the Science and History of Astrology

Astrology has been around for thousands of years and remains popular today, with many people looking to horoscopes and astrological readings for guidance.

But are astrology readings actually accurate and backed up by science? In this deep dive, we’ll explore the history and principles behind astrology, look at scientific research on its validity, and try to answer the question of whether astrological readings can provide true insight.

A Brief History of Astrology

Astrology originated over 3,000 years ago in Mesopotamia and was further developed by the Babylonians, Greeks, Romans, Arabs, and Indians. The basic principles were built around the idea that the positions and movements of celestial bodies like the Sun, Moon, planets, and stars influence events on Earth and human personality traits and behaviors.

The Basics of Astrology

There are a few key components that form the foundation of astrology:

The 12 Zodiac Signs

The zodiac wheel is comprised of 12 signs: Aries, Taurus, Gemini, Cancer, Leo, Virgo, Libra, Scorpio, Sagittarius, Capricorn, Aquarius, and Pisces. Your zodiac sign is determined by the date and location of your birth.

Planetary Placements

Astrologers look at where the Sun, Moon, and planets were located in the sky at the exact time and place you were born. The positions and relationships between these celestial bodies are said to shape your personality and life path.

Aspects and Angles

The angles and aspects between planets are also important factors. Aspects are the distances between planets as viewed from Earth. Certain angular relationships are considered major aspects, like when two planets are 120 degrees apart (called a trine).

Is There Any Scientific Basis for Astrology?

Astrology has often been dismissed by the scientific community as pseudoscience without solid evidence behind it. However, some research has been done to try to determine if astrology can accurately predict personality traits and life events. Here are some key findings:

  • The Barnum effect: Many statements made in astrological readings are vague and generalized enough that people relate them to themselves, known as the Barnum or Forer effect. This effect causes people to rate astrological readings as highly accurate when the statements are actually generic to a wide population.
  • No link between birth charts and personality: One of the few robust scientific studies, published in Nature in 1985 by Shawn Carlson, found no statistically significant correlations between natal astrology charts and standardized personality trait measures.
  • Confirmation bias: People are more likely to remember or highlight astrological predictions that seem to align with real-life events, while dismissing misses. This confirmation bias makes astrology seem more accurate than it may be.
  • Lack of mechanism: There is no known scientific mechanism by which stars and planets could affect human behavior and events on Earth in the way astrology claims.

The Subjective Value of Astrology

While astrology may lack concrete scientific evidence, it can still hold subjective value for some people. As a symbolic system and tool for self-reflection, astrology readings can offer insights into their own personality characteristics, motivations, and tendencies. This self-knowledge can lead to positive outcomes, even if the astrological predictions themselves are not founded in science.

Many people turn to astrology not necessarily for accurate predictions, but for enjoyment, entertainment, and feeling connected to something larger than themselves. Ultimately, the question of whether astrology readings are “accurate” depends on what one hopes to get from the experience.


Carlson, Shawn. “A double-blind test of astrology.” Nature 318.6045 (1985): 419-425.

Dean, Geoffrey. “Artifacts in data often wrongly seen as evidence for astrology.” The Astrological Journal 49.5 (2007): 427-430.

Fuzeau-Braesch, Suzel. “Astrology and science: A critical examination.” Psychological Reports 25.2 (1969): 591-607.

Phillipson, Garry. Astrology in the year zero. Flare Publications, 2000.

Popper, Karl. “Science: Conjectures and refutations.” Routledge and Kegan Paul (London) pp. 37-65 (1963).


There is little scientific evidence that astrological readings can accurately predict specific life events and personality traits. However, for many people today astrology still provides entertainment, counseling, and insight when viewed symbolically rather than literally. The question of whether to believe in astrology remains an open one, with validity depending upon individual experience and perspective.

Leave a comment